Bob Cooke TSTA Live therapy demonstration-
Using TA to access Child ego states
Bob Cooke TSTA -live therapy demonstration
Accessing”scared part” of self-to strengthen Adult ego state.
Bob Cooke TSTA Live Therapy demonstration— 5 mins of one session
Inside the Manchester Institute
Psycotherapy and Psychotherapy Training in Chorlton Manchester UK
The Manchester Institute for Psychotherapy (formerly The Life Stream Centre) was established in 1987 and moved to Chorlton in September 1988 where we have been ever since!
We have been in 454 Barlow Moor Road, Chorlton, for the last two decades – it has been an enormously enriching and challenging time.
The Institute is a four storey building comprising of twelve rooms and Two Training Rooms.
Over 18 Psychotherapists and Counsellors work from The Institute – most have been with us for many years.
For over 25 years we have offered a wide range of services to the community from Individual Therapy to Group Therapy and Personal Development Courses.
In 1993 we also established a Training Arm to the services we offer and to that end we have been training people to be psychotherapists since that time to the present day.
Recently we have extended our services by training people in the areas of Clinical Supervision and Child and Adolescent Studies.
In fact we now offer counselling and therapy to children as well as adults.
We are proud of our achievements and the services we have grown over the years, and we are specifically pleased to be serving such a vibrant community as Chorlton, where we feel we truly belong!
If you are interested in Transactional Analysis click here
Thank you.
Bob Cooke
(Founder of MIP)
Role of the External Examiner
The responsibilities of the External Examiner are set out as per UKCP guidelines, the HIP College Learning Outcomes and against the Post Graduate marking Scale.
They include monitoring all aspects of the assessment process, documentation and the standard and consistency of marking across a number of markers in line with UKCP guidelines.
Functions of External Examiner
1. External Examiners monitor the academic level of the training which is set by UKCP at Masters level. Clear identification of what constitutes Masters level must be in place. The trainers and external examiners need to have access to information indicating the agreed standard against which the teaching, examining and trainees performance is being measured. This may involve the observation of teaching and supervision sessions.
2. External Examiners ensure the consistency of the marking of written and oral work. Their role is to assess the level of the groups and cohorts rather than that of individual students. They thus monitor the overall standards of work within the organization. They examine samples of students work and benchmark the academic standards. They evaluate whether the internal markers are awarding grades in a consistent and fair way, that they are clearly identifying the reasons for the marks awarded against the grade descriptions provided, and that there are clear distinctions between grade bands. There needs to be clear grade descriptors appropriate to Masters level (National Occupational Standards Level 7) against which the internal examiners and external examiners can set their marks.
3. The External Examiner monitors the final examination process. This may include samples of work, vivas and tapes (audio and visual) depending on the nature of the final assessment. They may also attend some oral examinations.
4. External Examiners may also review the practical assessments and comment on these in the same way as they do with the academic work.
5. The External Examiner makes a minimum of one annual visit to MIP followed by a brief report.
6. The External Examiner writes a report for the Quinquennial Review.
7. The External Examiner may become involved in the examination appeals process.
Criteria for External Examiners
In almost all circumstances the External Examiner will need to be a senior psychotherapist within a member organisation of the HIP College. If MIP were to choose an External Examiner who is not a psychotherapist from within the College, then MIP must show how the Examiner meets the requirements to perform the above roles. The minimum standard must be that they are:
• A senior psychotherapist
• Familiar with most, if not all, psychotherapy training
• Familiar with the HIPC criteria for membership
• Have an understanding of the specific model of psychotherapy practiced within the organisation
• Familiar with what constitutes MA level work which is the required standard for UKCP trainings.
The assessments of MIP which will need externally assessing are as follows:
* Essays : Two 2,000 word essays per year – first year, second year and third year.
* Placement reports: up to 1,000 words for each client seen.
* Research project: 8,000 words to be completed by 1st April of the fourth year.
* Case Study: 5,000 words study of a client seen for up to 50 client hours, to be submitted by 1st April of the fourth year.
* Following completion of the fourth year, in order to gain UKCP accreditation the graduate will complete a 10,000 words case study and an evaluation of a 20 minutes recording of their clinical work.
* The assessment board process requires the graduate to present the training portfolio, the 10,000 words case study and the 20 minutes recording of their clinical work. This will be presented to four Accreditation Board members who will make the assessment.
Revised September 2019 –
(to be reviewed again at the next committee meeting)
SUSPENSION AND EXPULSION POLICY
SUSPENSION AND EXCLUSION POLICY
Policy Statement
This policy applies to all students attending MIP.
Policy Aims
MIP is committed to providing the highest standards of teaching and learning for all of its students and tutors will do everything possible to see that the individual needs of students are met. However, if a student:
* consistently, does not meet our academic expectations,
* displays poor behaviour for a sustained period,
* or commits an act amounting to gross misconduct,
then it may be necessary to suspend or even exclude them from their course at MIP. Failure to meet academic expectations may include repeated unexplained or unacceptable absence, persistent poor punctuality, a poor record of work submission or a failure to respond to measures put in place by the course tutor.
Suspensions
Suspensions and exclusions are wholly at the discretion of the Director of MIP.
A meeting will be arranged with the Director and the student to discuss the matter and make arrangements for the student to return. This will involve a set of clearly stated conditions that the student will have to adhere to, in order to remain at MIP.
Exclusion
Excluding students on a permanent basis is a highly regrettable situation and MIP will do everything in its power to avoid such a serious measure. Exclusion can occur if the conditions of a suspension are not met, or may be the result of a single act.
Students should be aware that any serious act of verbal or physical aggression, gross misconduct, or anything that compromises the safety of MIP students and staff members, will result in their immediate removal from MIP.
Appeals
It is the responsibility of the student to provide evidence to appeal their expulsion.
Gross Misconduct definition:
Theft
Fraud
Dishonesty
Breach of H&S Rules
Damage to property
Serious Incapacity
Alcohol and drug use
Offensive behaviour (see harassment policy).
Reviewed September 2019
Manchester Institute for Psychotherapy – Health and Safety Policy
- Introduction
- To limit the risks of Health & Safety issues at MIP.
- To provide and maintain safe equipment
- To ensure all designated individuals are competent to fulfil their roles.
- To minimise the risks of accidents and to maintain safe and healthy working conditions
2. Responsibilities:
- Overall and final responsibility for health and safety is held by the Principal Director.
- Day to day responsibility for ensuring that this policy is put into practice is held by the Administrator.
- All employees, therapists, students, trainers and visitors must adhere to this policy, co-operate on all health and safety matters and take reasonable care of their own health and safety.
- All health and safety concerns must be reported to the Administrator.
3. Risk Assessment:
- Risk assessments will be the responsibility of the Administrator. (see checklist).
- The findings of the risk assessment will be reported to the Principal Director who will action or approve any required amendments.
- The Administrator will reassess the risk. .
- Assessments will be undertaken every 12 months.
4. Induction:
Induction training will be provided for all employees by the Principal Director and the Administrator.
5. Accidents and First aid:
A first aid box is kept in both kitchen areas.
All accidents should be reported to the Administrator and reported in the first aid book which is kept in the main office on the shelf behind Administrator’s desk.
6. Emergency Procedures and fire evacuation:
The Administrator is responsible for ensuring that the fire risk assessment is undertaken and implemented.
Escape routes are checked by the Administrator regularly and fire extinguishers are checked and maintained every year.
Fire alarms are tested by the Administrator weekly.
7. Risk Assessment for MIP
i. What are the hazards?
Electrical equipment: microwave, heaters, kettles, computers, TVs, overhead projectors, lamps, light fittings, fans, dehumidifiers.
Carpets, rugs well maintained.
Boiler and heating system.
ii. Who might be harmed?
Staff, therapists, clients, students, visitors, trainers.
iii. What are we already doing?
Maintaining records of fire alarm testing. Compliance with fire regulations.
Maintaining furnishings and fittings.
Maintaining records of maintenance /replacement of electrical equipment.
iv. Implementation of the risk assessment
Fire alarm testing record book kept in office
Maintenance/replacement of electrical equipment indicated on equipment.
This policy is regularly reviewed every 18 months and updated a minimum of every 36 months as necessary.
Last revised May 2019
|
Manchester Institute Data Protection Policy
Manchester Institute for Psychotherapy – Grievance Policy and Procedure
It is recognised that grievances can arise when a student, trainee, trainer, member of MIP or staff member is unhappy about their personal situation regarding their course, or in their dealings with students, or with staff, trainers or the organisation, and that a speedy resolution of such grievances is in the interests of all concerned.
This procedure aims to bring about the rapid resolution of grievances, without recourse to formal proceedings wherever possible. Nothing in this procedure impinges on the legal rights or obligations of staff, members of the public, trainers or students.
Grievances will be regarded as confidential but all individuals concerned will need to be interviewed if the grievance is to be resolved.
Grievances which are anonymous or based on rumour cannot be investigated.
The Institute reserves the right to take disciplinary action against any person whose grievance is found to be based on false allegations.
Decisions and actions taken in relation to a grievance are not influenced by the person’s background or situation, and each case is dealt with on its own merits.
Informal procedure
If a grievance exists, before invoking the formal procedure every effort should be made to resolve the issue informally by raising your concerns with the person(s) involved or with the clinical director, or your personal tutor. If this does not lead to a satisfactory outcome, or if you feel unable to discuss the matter with the person(s) involved, you may opt to invoke the formal grievance procedure.
If the grievance has been resolved informally, no record will be kept on file unless both parties wish to have a note made of what has been agreed.
Formal Procedure
Students
If the matter has not been resolved informally to everyone’s satisfaction, a member of the tutorial team will be appointed to establish the nature of the grievance and will make a written record on the Grievance Form to be signed by those concerned confirming this is an accurate representation. The form will be passed to the Quality & Ethics Committee at the Manchester Institute for Psychotherapy for action, who may convene an extraordinary meeting, and investigate the matter through the Institute’s complaints procedure.
If the grievance is against another student, the Grievance Form will be submitted within two working days to an appropriate tutor. The tutor will send a letter of acknowledgement within five working days and instigate an investigation.
Following investigation, written notification of the outcome will be given as soon as possible, normally within 15 working days of the grievance having been notified. The written notification will include reasons for the outcome, any right of appeal and an explanation of the appeal procedure.
If the grievance is against a member of staff or trainer, it will be referred immediately to the Quality & Ethics Committee who will follow the Institute’s complaints procedure.
If a conflict of interest exists, the complaint will be passed to an external moderator.
Trainers and Members of Staff
Trainers and members of staff are required to follow the above procedure and report the grievance to the Trainers meeting and the Quality & Ethics Committee.
Members of the Public
Members of the public can forward their grievance to the Quality & Ethics Committee and there will be an extraordinary meeting by the committee within four weeks of receiving the written grievance. They will be informed of the outcome within four weeks of the aforementioned meeting.
Appeals
If an appeal is to be made against the outcome of a grievance this should be done in writing within ten working days of the decision being notified.
The outcome of the appeal will be notified in writing within a further ten working days.
A complainant has the right to seek advice from outside the Institute at any stage of the proceedings
Monitoring
The outcome of investigations and responses to grievances will be
reported quarterly to the Director of MIP. All those involved with the grievance will also be notified.
This policy is regularly reviewed every 18 months.
Last revision December 2018
GRIEVANCE FORM
Incident Date: …………………………… Incident Time: …………………………..
Reported to: ………………………………………………
Complainant’s Details:
Name: ……………………………………………………………………………………….
Address: …………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Tel: ……………………………………………………………………………………………
Course Title (if applicable): ………………………………………………………………..
Trainer (if applicable): ………………………………………………………………………
Complainant given information about procedure: Y N
Full details of the complaint including date and time and place.
I agree that this is an accurate record.
Signed………………………………. ……………..
(complainant
Action
What complainant wants to do next:
Steps that have been taken to resolve this informally:
What we have done/will do:
Sent to: ………………………………………………….
Signed (Recorder)……………………………………..
Date: ……………………………………………………
Signed …………………………………………………..
(Member) ………………………………………………..
Signed ……………………………………………………
(Member) ………………………………………………..
Signed ……………………………………………………
(Quality & Ethics Committee): …………………………
Follow up:
Signature……………………………………….. Date………………………..